[Grace-core] Reader comment on Grace: A Manifesto for a New Educational Object-Oriented Programming Language
Andrew P. Black
black at cs.pdx.edu
Mon Nov 1 12:01:52 PDT 2010
Did anyone respond to this? Should I?
Andrew
On 29 Oct 2010, at 14:50, Jack Rosenberger wrote:
> Dear Alex, Kim and James,
>
> I’m passing along the below reader comment on my CACM post abt Grace, http://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/100389-grace-a-manifesto-for-a-new-educational-object-oriented-programming-language/fulltext, in case you’re interested in responding.
>
> Jack
>
> --
>
> As a professional developer with ~20 years of experiencing, I'm part of the movement that wants to de-emphasize object-oriented programming in favor of functional programming. I say this as someone who was once convinced that OOP is the best modularity approach for software (and I flirted with aspect-oriented programming for a while...). Therefore, I would prefer a teaching language that emphasizes functional programming over object-oriented programming, not the other way around.
>
> — K Wampler, October 29, 2010
>
>
> <image001.jpg>
>
More information about the Grace-core
mailing list