[Grace-core] visibility and reflection
Kim Bruce
kim at cs.pomona.edu
Fri Aug 3 21:31:28 PDT 2012
Certainly private methods should not be accessible. I have mixed feelings about confidential. Do we want reflection to be able to define a subobject of an existing object (with unknown type). If so, then we will need to be able to find the confidential methods. On the other hand, my gut tells me that the should not be visible from outside. What do others think?
Kim
On Aug 3, 2012, at 8:58 PM, Andrew P. Black wrote:
> Here's a question: should one be able to use reflection to run a confidential method?
>
> Right now, minigrace prohibits this; is this what we want?
>
> SOme news: I have a first version of GUnit passing its own (inadequate) tests. I gave up using Amy's sets, since I can't iterate over them, and used mgcollections.list instead.
>
> Andrew
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grace-core mailing list
> Grace-core at cecs.pdx.edu
> https://mailhost.cecs.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/grace-core
More information about the Grace-core
mailing list