[Grace-core] Mintues from Meeting 2-3.07.2012

Andrew P. Black black at cs.pdx.edu
Mon Jul 9 16:45:47 PDT 2012


Wasn't it our deliberate goal to disallow testing for equality of done?  As Michael points out, this can always be achieved using reflection, but I thought that we deliberately didn't want to allow testing of Equality to stop done being used as nil. 

Andrew

Sent from my iPhone, please Xqze my typing. 


On Jul 8, 2012, at 18:50, Michael Homer <mwh at ecs.vuw.ac.nz> wrote:

> On Jul 7, 2012 8:27 PM, "James Noble" <kjx at ecs.vuw.ac.nz> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all
>> 
>> Andrew typed up the notes below from our meeting on Monday & Tuesday this week.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> We're pretty sure about the proposals for modules, annotations, default inheritance, and most of information hiding.
>> 
>> James now thinks the details of the information hiding as regards variables are somewhat - unspecified - but it's more than a start.
>> 
>> we're very interested in feedback on all these proposals;
>> we hope to consolidate them into the spec relatively quickly,
>> and (assuming they hold up) then move the into the implementation.
> Some way of detecting that you have the singleton "done" would be
> useful, since there's no equality on it. "!Object.match(x)") would do
> at a pinch but a better way would be nice.
> -Michael
> _______________________________________________
> Grace-core mailing list
> Grace-core at cecs.pdx.edu
> https://mailhost.cecs.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/grace-core


More information about the Grace-core mailing list