I approve! It is more consistent OO to show a message send for these ops rather than having special syntax. Kim On Jul 2, 2014, at 12:06 AM, Timothy Jones <tim at ecs.vuw.ac.nz> wrote: > On 02/07, James Noble wrote: >> But still a[4] subscripts > > I'm in favour of removing subscripting ([] and []:=) in favour of at() and > at() put(). > > -- > Tim