[Grace-core] minigrace oddness

[Andrew P Black]

On 26 Jun 2014, at 00:59 , Kim Bruce <kim at cs.pomona.edu> wrote:

> Makes sense.  Thanks!  I had forgotten that we needed to get exactly the right number of outer's.
> 
> I'm wondering if perhaps we might want to have a marker for things available at a certain level or above.  What I found confusing in my example was that "for" was clearly available in the outer scope, yet I couldn't get it via outer.for.  Perhaps it would make sense to allow programmers to write outer+.m to refer to an m available via some number of outer's -- i.e. to access something that is visible in the outer scope.
> 
> Just a thought.

Ugh!  Why not give the object a name?

	Andrew