[Grace-core] Putative Blog Posts
James Noble
kjx at ecs.vuw.ac.nz
Thu Nov 4 12:25:33 PDT 2010
> By the by, I have so far gotten through the first three "Gracenotes".
I saw that, that's great.
Especailly as you mostly agree with what's there.
> My comments all have my name associated. (Is there some easy way to
> designate our comments in this environment so that they stick out?)
> I've also fixed a bunch of typos.
good, I was writing those very jetlagged...
> I'll try to get through the rest today.
that would be great, then hopefully we can start publishing
> As for the "top level" blocks. Perhaps we can more accurately say
> they are context-dependent since they are nested.
hmm, I guess so, although the language itself is context free (I hope)
> Part of me wants to say they should be written something like " =>
> {...}" if we want closures, but that just seems too damn ugly!
yep. And things then get weird if you leave out the => ( which I guess
is the block invocation operator).
I think the current design is a nice (local) optimum, but it may be
controversial - so that's why I think
we should get this post our first, to see how tolerable it all is...
J
More information about the Grace-core
mailing list