[Grace-core] Frustrations working on Minigrace
David Pearce
David.Pearce at ecs.vuw.ac.nz
Wed May 21 14:18:08 PDT 2014
Hi all,
> Regarding GitHub, my experience has been quite good, but I'm sure it
> depends on how it is used. The way I'm familiar with, nothing gets
> merged to the main line development branch without getting a review.
> Those reviews are logged, and if you want to know why something was
> deleted, it ought to be possible to pull up the review approval for
> the deletion.
>
> GitHub also has issue tracking, if you don't already have some other
> server for that.
I agree with this. Git and GitHub are pretty good IMHO ... I would
never go back to e.g. SVN or similar. Using the issue tracker is
important, and branching can be a good way to develop new stuff without
break the master branch. Git is much better at merging branches than
SVN was.
Cheers!
Dave
> Best wishes sorting this stuff out. We've all been there, and it's a
> miserable use of time to spend hours getting something to work that
> everyone is la-dee-dah saying is already working.
>
> Lex Spoon
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grace-core mailing list
> Grace-core at cecs.pdx.edu
> https://mailhost.cecs.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/grace-core
>
--
Senior Lecturer in Computer Science,
School of Engineering and Computer Science
Victoria University of Wellington,
PO Box 600,
Wellington,
New Zealand.
Office: Cotton 231
Telephone: +64 (0)4 463 5833
URL: http://ecs.victoria.ac.nz/~djp
More information about the Grace-core
mailing list